Robo VS Human, Page 8

pr 27, 2015 9:14 a.m. ET

Slide 8 of 11

Not as stock-heavy: Everette Orr said the 35-year-old might want to go with a Vanguard target-date fund, but such funds are aggressive in how much they put into stocks. “If they’re really middle-of-the-road, then I would probably back them off,” said Orr, who runs McLean, Va.–based Orr Financial Planning. He would instead recommend the Vanguard STAR Fund VGSTX, +0.19% a fund of funds that is roughly 60% stocks and 40% bonds.

A significant difference: Orr’s recommendation puts less into stocks than the other three human advisers’ suggestions. And among the robo advisers, they’re all more equity-heavy, except for Schwab, which also only sticks about 60% into stocks. Kitces said that while the eight recommended portfolios are “not massively different,” the variations in how much gets put into stocks is “actually pretty material.”

Fees: Orr said the 35-year-old would likely pay a $600 fee, as he charges $200 per hour and that would cover a two-hour, face-to-face consultation and one hour of prep work. He added that he’s not currently taking new hourly clients, and for clients with at least $300,000, he charges 1% for the first $500,000, then 0.5% for the next half million and 0.25% beyond the $1 million mark.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s